The Coopers of Long Hill

Document A.132 · probate index · transcription: verbatim

Sussex Co., N.J. ESTATE INDEX, page 14 — the C-R × A/B given-name cell: two Cooper estates, files 1664 (Ann) and 1665 (Andrew J.).

repository
Sussex County Surrogate's Office, Newton, N.J.
collection
Estate Index (Russell Index), A-H reel, DGS 005679620, image 166
identifier
Page 14 — the cell where Cooper estates with an A- or B- given name are filed. Predicted at image 164 and actually at 166 — the anchors in the body record the correction.

What is transcribed: Page 14's two Cooper rows.

People named

As writtenRoleIdentified asWhat this document says
Cooper, Andrew J mentioned Andrew J. Cooper 1855–1911
death: 26 Mar 1911, Green Twp., Sussex Co., New Jersey
Grant Cooper administrator Ulysses Grant Cooper 1878–1953
Cooper, Ann mentioned

What this document records

It confirms andrew j from the county side

File 1665 · Cooper, Andrew J · d. 26 March 1911 · Green Tp · Grant Cooper Admr. The county's own index states the administrator, and he is Ulysses Grant Cooper, the decedent's son — which [A.157]'s 1912 receipts then confirm from the receipt side, each styled "one of the children of Andrew J. Cooper." It is also a third independent source for his death date, alongside [G.508] and [L.159].

A second cooper nobody has worked

File 1664 · Cooper, Ann · d. 22 December 1885 · Sparta Tp · James W. Crigar Admr. Not the Ann Cooper of [A.162], whose insolvent estate was settled in 1886 — or possibly the same; the catalog has not checked, and the dates are adjacent enough to matter.

One digit is an ink blob

The Proceedings block number for file 1665 is illegible — an ink blob — so the row reads 2 · 23 · [?]. [A.133] resolved it by reading page 23 entire rather than guessing the block.

The russell key

How the index works, since it is not obvious: the surname keys to a code (r for Cooper) and the given-name initial picks the row. ⇒ one surname's estates are scattered across many pages by first name. The full key table is at [A.128].

Transcription and notes

Provenance, how the Russell key scatters one surname across pages, the blotted block digit, and the unworked second Cooper are all in the source: and coverage: headers and are not repeated here.

Page 14 is the cell where Cooper estates whose subject has an A- or B- given name are filed (the Russell key: surname keys to r, given-name initial picks the row — see [A.128] for the full key table). It was predicted at image 164 and is actually at image 166; see the anchors below.

The two Coopers [verbatim]

File No. Estate Date of death / Residence Personal representative Proceedings Vol/Page/Blk
1664 Cooper — Ann Dec 22 1885 · Sparta Tp James W Crigar Admr 2 · 23 · 4
1665 Cooper — Andrew J = [p.1792] Mar 26 1911 · Green Tp Grant Cooper Admr = his son [p.1793] 2 · 23 · [illegible]

The block digit for 1665 is an ink blob at the frame edge and does NOT resolve at 16x. The volume and page (2 · 23) are legible. Whoever pulls the Proceedings block will have to scan page 23 of volume 2 for the Cooper name rather than jumping to a block number.

Both sheets of page 14 were checked; these are the only Coopers. The non-Cooper neighbours, in order, run: Cornkuser, Carruth, Coursen, Courson, Carner, Coursen, Crevelling, Coursen, Carr, Coursen, Carpenter, Christy, Carpenter, Corkey, Carpenter, Crossman, Carmer, Carmer, Crane, Cortright, Crane, Curry, Coursen, Curry, Crane, Courtright, Courtright, Crane, Cooper (Ann), Carmer, Coursen, Cortright, Corwin, Current, Carr, Carpenter, Coursen, Coursen, Crispin, Craig, Carmello, Cooper (Andrew J). Every one is a C-R surname with an A/B given name — a fourth independent confirmation that the Russell key is being read correctly.

The file numbers say the Cooper estates are a CONTIGUOUS BLOCK — and two are missing

Set the known 19th-century Sussex Cooper file numbers side by side:

File Estate Source
1664 Ann this entry
1665 Andrew J this entry
1666 Caleb S [A.128]
1667 Charles A [A.128]
1668 ** UNKNOWN** —
1669 ** UNKNOWN** —
1670 Elias Proceedings Index, DGS 005679623 p. 24
1671 Effie M ditto
1672 John J ditto
1673 James H ditto
1674 Phebe Ann ditto
1675 Robert A ditto
1676 Sarah J ditto

⇒ Eleven of thirteen consecutive numbers are accounted for, and every one is a Cooper. The county evidently assigned Cooper estates a contiguous run when the index was compiled. So files 1668 and 1669 are almost certainly two more Cooper estates the catalog has never seen — and their given names must begin with a letter whose page has not been read (the unread cells are 44 G/H, 54 I/J, 64 K/L, 74 M/N, 84 sheet 2 R/S, 104 W-Z).

"Almost certainly" is doing work in that sentence. The run is an observed pattern across eleven numbers, not a stated rule, and nothing on the page says the block is unbroken. It is a lead of high promise, not a finding.

And note what it does NOT explain: [A.128] recorded page 34 — the C-R × E/F cell, where Elias (1670) should sit — as entirely blank. Elias demonstrably has a Sussex estate. So either the Estate Index omits him while the Proceedings Index carries him, or page 34 was misidentified. Unresolved; worth one look when someone is next on this reel.

Page-to-image anchors read off the printed headers

The film record predicted page 14 at image 164. It is at 166.

DGS image book pages
164 11 | 12
165 12 (sheet 2) | 13
166 13 (sheet 2) | 14 (sheet 1)

⇒ the "page = image − 150" rule is already two pages adrift by page 14, at the start of the volume — so it is not merely the volume-2 boundary that breaks it ([A.128] found it broken past image ~243). Interpolate, then read the printed page number. Recorded in films/film.5679620.yaml.

Cross-references