The Coopers of Long Hill

Document I.146 · transcription: verbatim

Genealogy — A Journal of American Ancestry, Vol. 4 No. 6, May 1914 — abstract of Daniel Cooper × Mrs Gibb 1788 New Brunswick NJ marriage

Transcription and notes

Source identification

Element Value
Title Genealogy — A Journal of American Ancestry
Volume / Issue Vol. 4 No. 6
Publication date May 1914
Type Published genealogical journal (early 20th century)
Catalog item Marriage abstract — Daniel Cooper × Mrs Gibb, 3 Nov 1788
On-disk location Ancestry user-shared photo by ckCampbell1828 originally shared 28 Apr 2020; saved on Ancestry trees linking Barbara Margaretta Unknown Gibb + Daniel Cooper Sr
Maintainer's screenshot 2026-05-28
Status [verbatim] (= image is a published-text photo)

Verbatim text

The clipping shows a single abstract entry:

"New Brunswick — Daniel Cooper of Long Hill, Morris Co., aged 90 to Miss Gibb, relict of Richard Gibb, aged 79."

What this source establishes

1. Third independent attestation of the 12 Nov 1788 NJ Journal marriage notice

This 1914 abstract is the THIRD independent source recording the marriage: - Original primary: J.152 NJ Journal 12 Nov 1788 verbatim-on-disk = "aged 90 / aged 79 / fifth helpmate" - Modern compilation: M.41 Woodley 1989 DAR app citing Wilson 1985 Notices from NJ Newspapers 1781-1790 Vol 1 p. 223 = "aged 90 wife 79" - 1914 abstract: this I.146 = "aged 90 to Miss Gibb, relict of Richard Gibb, aged 79"

= Three independent attestations of the bride aged 79 datum → b. ~1709 is now triply corroborated.

2. NEW datum — explicit "relict of Richard Gibb"

The 1914 abstract adds the explicit annotation "relict of Richard Gibb" which the J.152 verbatim (just "Mrs. Gibb of New-Brunswick") did not contain. = the 1914 editor either: - (a) Knew Richard Gibb's identity independently and added the editorial note, OR - (b) Was abstracting from a different primary source (= different newspaper or marriage record) that named Richard

= reinforces catalog conclusion (per A.71) that Barbara was Richard Gibb's widow before marrying Daniel Sr.

3. "Miss Gibb" usage

The 1914 abstract uses "Miss Gibb" rather than "Mrs. Gibb" — this is 1914 editorial wording, NOT the original NJ Journal's wording (J.152 says "Mrs. Gibb"). Reflects early-20th-century lazy editing where "Miss" was sometimes used for any woman whose first name wasn't given. Does not contradict her widow status.

Catalog cross-references

Follow-up

  1. Acquire full Genealogy: A Journal of American Ancestry Vol 4 No 6 May 1914 — = published genealogical journal; possibly digitized via HathiTrust, Internet Archive, or Allen County Public Library. Could surface additional Daniel-Sr-family or Cooper-line abstracts.
  2. Identify the 1914 abstract's primary source — = does the journal cite which newspaper it abstracted from? If different from NJ Journal 12 Nov 1788, that's a NEW primary source.
  3. Verify ckCampbell1828's identification of this clipping with the Ancestry tree linking