The Coopers of Long Hill

Document A.124 · probate index · transcription: verbatim

Warren Co., N.J. — the “Letters of administration and guardianship” 1851–1870 volume's own alphabetical INDEX, C block: exactly two Coopers, both adults.

repository
Warren County Surrogate's Office, Belvidere, N.J.
collection
FamilySearch DGS 005679647 (265 images), catalogued as Guardianship Records 1851-1870
identifier
The C block, images 7-8. The volume is thumb-indexed with cut letter tabs — C D E F G H J K L M N are visible on the fore-edge of image 8.

What is transcribed: The whole C block, read top to bottom.

People named

As writtenRoleIdentified asWhat this document says
Cooper, Joseph mentioned Joseph Cooper 1785–1852
Cooper, Aaron mentioned Aaron Cooper Sr 1784–1851 probable

What this document records

The null is the point

EXACTLY TWO COOPERS IN TWENTY YEARS OF WARREN LETTERS AND GUARDIANSHIPS, AND BOTH ARE ADULTS. ⇒ no Cooper guardianship appears in the volume 1851-1870. That is a real negative for [pr.14] and [pr.17]: a guardianship names a dead parent and surviving minors, and there is none to find here.

It is a volume index not a county index

It indexes one book, not the county. A Cooper guardianship recorded in a different Warren volume, or in the Orphans' Court rather than the Surrogate's letters book, would not appear — so this is a bounded null, not a general one.

Transcription and notes

Provenance, the negative that is this entry's value, and the boundary of that negative are in the source: and coverage: headers and are not repeated here.

Images downloaded 2026-08-09 and saved to Death/Wills and Probate/New Jersey/Warren County/Warren County NJ Letters of Administration and Guardianship 1851-1870/: - (image held in the family archive) (4931 × 3573) - (image held in the family archive) (4846 × 3542)

Transcribed by eye at 3–4× from the saved JPEGs — not from FamilySearch's machine transcript, which reads the Joseph line as "Copper Joseph".

Data from the document — image 7, the start of the C block [verbatim]

Nine lines, then the page is blank. Columns are surname + given name | status | register page:

"Chamberlin Susannah decd — 5 Crisman John " — 5 Cooper Joseph " — 25 Carhart Lourance S a minor — 31 Carhart Sarah " " — 32 Clawson Jacob deceased — 51 Carter Joseph C " — 62 Creveling John " — 61 Cole Samuel " — 109"

Data from the document — image 8, the C block continued [verbatim]

Both pages. The left page runs from register page ~8 to 236, the right page 236 to ~389. The Cooper Aaron line and its immediate neighbours, read by eye:

"Cooke William S & Elizabeth R Minors — 165 Clark William decd — 172 Cooper Aaron — — 175 Cook Catharine — — 200 Crisman Oscar — — 216 Cook Marcus A — — 231"

Minors are indexed under their own surname throughout this block — the lines that establish it:

"Carhart Lourance S a minor — 31 · Carhart Sarah a minor — 32 · Carhart John & Jesse minors — 22 & 23 · Caskey Clarinda C., Mary E. & Adriana N. Minors — 39/45 · Chambers Wilber F., Oliver, Leonidas, Lanellas minors — 77 · Chambers Luther a minor — 78 · Crutz Wm, Lydia, Anna, Peter & Charles Minors — 88 · Crawford Elizabeth a minor — 99 · Carter Sarah A & Margaret D. Minors — 113 & 114 · Carter Sarah F., Joseph S. & Jacob V. Minor — 117 & 118 · Creveling John M a minor — 150 · Creveling Edward a minor — 150 · Creveling William H a minor — 150 · Creveling James A a minor — 151 · Creveling John W a minor — 151 · Cooke Edna & Sarah E. Minors — 288 · Cooke Theodore & Ann Minors — 288 · Cook Silas P a minor — 230 · Cummins Rebecca J. & Ann Mary Minors — 233 · Campbell William A a minor — 264 · Creveling Abraham L. a minor, Guardianship — 316 · Cline Garner A. a Lunatic, Guardianship — 317 · Crutz Anna a Minor, Guardianship — 327"

No Cooper minor

Both pages of image 7 and image 8 were read line by line. The C block contains exactly two Coopers, and both are decedents: Joseph (p. 25) and Aaron (p. 175). No Cooper appears as a minor or ward anywhere in it.

And the rest of the index has now been swept too (2026-08-09): images 9–41, covering A–Y, searched for any Cooper-shaped string. Zero hits outside the C block. So no Cooper was mis-filed under another letter.

Scope of the negative, stated precisely. - It is a negative about the index, not proof no proceeding exists. - The C block was read by eye; the A–Y sweep trusted FamilySearch's OCR of a difficult hand — deliberately searched loosely, because this reel's OCR renders the one known Cooper line as "Copper". The sweep is moderate-confidence, not verbatim. - Seven images returned no transcript (11, 12, 21, 23, 25, 31, 40) and were not visually checked. Image 9 was, and is a genuinely blank spread. An empty transcript is not a negative. - The one case no index search can close: this index is keyed on the ward or decedent, not the guardian — every minor line reads "surname given a minor / Minors". So a Cooper ward would be under Cooper. But if a Cooper child was placed and the entry written under the guardian's family name, searching for "Cooper" cannot find it. Only reading the 1851–53 register pages themselves would. - It covers 1851–1870.

Cross-references

Open follow-ups