The Coopers of Long Hill

Document A.25 · probate abstract · transcription: verbatim

Honeyman, Calendar of NJ Wills Vol. II (NJ Archives 1st Series Vol. XXX) — the abstract of John Cooper of Middletown, Monmouth Co., intestate 17 April 1733, with the £18.18.6 inventory. Lib. B, p. 421.

date
1733-04-17
repository
Published archival abstract
collection
Honeyman, A. Van Doren, ed., Calendar of New Jersey Wills, Administrations, etc., Volume II 1730-1750 = New Jersey Archives, First Series, Volume XXX (1918).
identifier
The Cooper, John, of Middletown entries; the abstract cites Lib. B, p. 421
Cite this page "Honeyman, Calendar of NJ Wills Vol. II (NJ Archives 1st Series Vol. XXX) — the abstract of John Cooper of Middletown, Monmouth Co., intestate 17 April 1733, with the £18.18.6 inventory. Lib. B, p. 421.", document A.25, The Coopers of Long Hill, njcoopers.com/e/A.25/

People named

As writtenRoleIdentified asWhat this document says
Cooper, John deceased
Roelof Skank administrator
Aure Van Dorn appraiser
Jacob Vandorn appraiser
Robert Dodsworth appraiser
Robert Manns mentioned
Oliver Silverthorne mentioned

What this document records

It names no heir

AN INTESTATE ABSTRACT NAMES NO HEIRS, AND THAT IS STRUCTURAL, NOT AN OMISSION. Distribution was settled separately — administrator's bond, final accounting, petitions of distribution — in loose-paper files at NJSA. ⇒ this abstract cannot test any parentage hypothesis, and the file behind Lib. B p. 421 is what would.

What it does show about him

HE KEPT TWO ACCOUNT BOOKS, AND THEY DESCRIBE A LIVELIHOOD: "his Credits in two several books set down, the one in his Tavern Book and the other in his freight book" ⇒ a tavern-keeper who was also in freight or cartage. The estate is £18.18.6 — small; for scale, Elias Van Court's 1750 inventory ([A.16]) was £258.16.1.

The administrator is a stranger

ADMINISTRATION WENT TO ROELOFF SCHENCK, A BREWER — NOT TO A WIDOW OR A SON. Colonial NJ practice granted administration to spouse or eldest son first, and to a third party only when those were unavailable, absent or refused. Suggestive of a man without near kin at hand — and the abstract says nothing about why, so it is recorded as an observation, not a finding. The inventory was taken at Schenck's own house, which implies the effects were moved there.

Daniel sr parentage test

HE IS CANDIDATE #2 IN THE POST-[A.24] SEARCH FOR DANIEL SR'S FATHER, and the test is argued on Daniel Cooper Sr, not here. In short: chronology and geography both fit; the family tradition ([I.36]) has a John Cooper dying in New York City c. 1700-1715, which contradicts a 1733 Middletown death; and the decisive evidence — who inherited — is not in this document.

Transcription and notes

Provenance, why an intestate abstract can name no heirs, what the two account books show, and the parentage test are all in the source: and coverage: headers and are not repeated here. The candidacy is argued on [p.1].

Verbatim — full Cooper, John, of Middletown abstract

1733, April 17. Cooper, John, of Middletown, Monmouth Co. Int. Adm'r, Roelof Skank. Lib. B, p. 421.

1733, August 4. Inventory, appraised at house of Roeloffe Schenck, brewer, £18.18.6. Includes notes from Robert Manns and Oliver Silverthorne, and "To his Credits in two several books set down, the one in his Tavern Book and the other in his freight book." Made by Aure Van Dorn, Jacob Vandorn and Robert Dodsworth.

(Spelling note: "Roelof Skank" in the appointment line and "Roeloffe Schenck" in the inventory line are the same individual — Honeyman's abstract preserves the original spelling variants from the underlying loose-paper documents. Standardized form: Roeloff Schenck, brewer of Middletown Monmouth Co. NJ.)