The Coopers of Long Hill

Document C.115 · marriage return · transcription: verbatim

Sussex County, New Jersey — the loose marriage return of the Reverend John Boyd, six couples married 22 August – 24 November 1812, signed by him. FamilySearch New Jersey, County Marriages, 1682-1956; DGS 004541257 ("Sussex. Marriage Records 1809–1827"), image 326 of 1,634.

repository
FamilySearch — New Jersey, County Marriages, 1682-1956
collection
Sussex. Marriage Records 1809–1827 (loose returns); DGS 004541257, image 326 of 1,634
date
1812-11-12

What is transcribed: One minister's return, complete — the six marriages he certifies, the certificate clause, and his signature. The image carries nothing else.

People named

As writtenRoleIdentified asWhat this document says
Cooper, Robert groom Robert Cooper 1783–1863 candidate
Sheffer, Sophia bride Sophia (Sheffer) Cooper 1792 candidate
Boyd, John officiant

What this document records

What it says

"Robert Cooper & Sophia Sheffer were married Nov[r]. 12 — 1812", the fifth of six couples, in a return signed "John Boyd". This is the document behind the index row Robert Cooper was working from, and the index proved exactly faithful to it.

What it does not say

No ages, no residences, no parents, no witnesses, no township. The return gives names and dates and nothing else. ⇒ It cannot, by itself, say which Robert Cooper this is — that argument lives at Robert Cooper, not here. Nor does it state where the marriage took place. "Sussex, New Jersey" is the county of the return, not a stated venue.

Transcription and notes

Data from the document [verbatim]

Read at 2× (names and dates) and 4× (the bride's surname, the signature):

Isaac Dennus[?] & Hulda Shaw were married August 22 — 1812 Thomas Hunt jun[r] & Rebecca Turner were married Aug 25ᵗʰ — 1812 Robert Lanning & Mary Decker were were married Sepᵗ 17 — 1812 George Hunt & Eliza Brown were married Sept. 24ᵗʰ — 1812 Robert Cooper & Sophia Sheffer were married Novʳ. 12 — 1812 Benjamine Chandler & Mary Luce were married Novʳ 24 — 1812

I do certify that the above named persons were respectively married on the times above mentioned by me

John Boyd (signature)

The doubled "were were" on line 3 is the document's, not a transcription slip — the writer wrote the word twice.

The bride's surname reads SHEFFER at 4× — S-h-e-f-f-e-r, with the doubled descender of a period ff. Not Shepper, not Sheffen. The FamilySearch index has it right — and [C.116]'s register clerk, copying from this return into the county book, wrote the same six letters.

What this record does NOT contain

No ages. No residences. No parents. No occupations. No witnesses. No venue. New Jersey's parent-naming marriage returns — the series with a Names of Parents column — begin in 1848; this is a minister's return of 1812, and it carries names and dates only.

That is structural, not an omission. It is the same limitation that stopped [C.84] from saying whose son its Samuel was.

The index was faithful — worth recording, on a week when four were not

The index row read Robert Cooper × Sophia Sheffer, 12 Nov 1812, Sussex, New Jersey. The document says exactly that.

In the four days to 2026-09-23 this catalog found four index-vs-document discrepancies — Banar for Ben R., Ardilla Burket for Ardella Twiggs, Son for stepson, Employee for Servant. Every one was in a field the indexer had to interpret: a cramped given name, a maiden surname, a relationship term. This one is a field the indexer only had to copy — and copying is what indexes are reliably good at.

⇒ the lesson is not "indexes lie". It is "an index is a finding aid, never the record" — which is why the page was pulled even though the row turned out to be right. The cost of checking a true row is one download; the cost of trusting a false one is a day.

Cross-references